2) I agree with the article in that many subdivisions are very boring. There is never anything exciting going on that people can take part in. It is rare that there are ever neighborhood events. It also is sad to drive through subdivisions where all the houses look almost identical. Uniqueness and innovation in housing always is fun to see and admire, so it is a shame when neither of this happens. I never realized that there was such a strict ordinance that designers and builders follow, but I agree with the author in that new options need to be explored. Urban sprawl and the development of subdivisions is certainly not a negative thing, and this exploration can make it even more positive. I believe that subdivisions are necessary because they offer a much different environment than the city. It is generally much safer in subdivisions, and it offers more privacy and freedom for people to do what they want. In the city, everything can seem crowded and there is little room for people to do things with their houses.
3) I do live in a subdivision, but I do not think the author's viewpoints apply to my neighborhood. My neighborhood has a pretty good variety in housing styles and design. There are houses of all sizes and colors. The landscaping is all different because the yards all have different sizes and shapes. There is a big hill in part of my subdivision, so this has led to a lot of variety in the architecture. One thing that is pretty prominent in my neighborhood is that many people seem to have an in-ground pool. I would not be one to complain about this though.
No comments:
Post a Comment